This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. The Chief Constable was named as defendant in the action pursuant to section 48(1) of the Police Act 1964. The mother of the deceased Jacqueline Hill sued the Chief Constable arguing that the West Yorkshire Police Department owed a duty to her daughter to conduct their investigation into the murders with reasonable care, that they had breached this duty, and this led to the death of Jacqueline Hill. The reasonably foreseeable risk of injury to the Appellant when the arrest was attempted was enough to impose a duty of care on the officers. Jacqueline' Mother made a claim against the Chief Constable on the grounds that the police had been negligent in their detection and detention of Sutcliffe. A number of the same failings would be highlighted subsequently in the Byford Report. These factors should only be considered in novel cases. The officer made an operational assessment that he could not immediately make an arrest. Some further ingredient is invariably needed to establish the requisite proximity of relationship between plaintiff and defendant, and all the circumstances of the case must be carefully considered and analysed in order to ascertain whether such an ingredient is present." He noted that the two cases were similar, but held that no duty of care arose between Yorkshire Police and Ms Hill. Otherwise, a claimant can argue that a public body's decision was unlawful in five main types of case: (1) it exceeded the lawful power of the body, used its power for an improper purpose, or acted unreasonably, (2) it violated a legitimate expectation, (3) failed to exercise relevant and independent judgement, (4) exhibited bias or a conflict of interest, or failed to give a fair hearing, and (5) violated a human right. It established a broad test for determining the existence of a duty of care in the tort of negligence called the Anns test or sometimes the two-stage test for true third-party negligence. Often it is a psychiatric disorder triggered by witnessing an accident, for example an injury caused to one's parents or spouse. The House of Lords unanimously struck out the claim as disclosing no justiciable cause of action, upholding the decision of the judge at first instance and of the Court of Appeal. Only $2.99/month . All except two of his murders took place in West Yorkshire; the others were in Manchester. In Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the Court clarified that Lord Bridge did not create a tripartite test in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman.Instead, he identified a set of factors which indicate whether a duty of care is owed. A claim followed in negligence for personal injury against the Chief Constable. The English courts all agreed that the police owed no duty of care to the applicants, confirming the law in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police where it was ruled that the police owed no duty of care to one of the victims of the Yorkshire Ripper. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465 is an English tort law case on economic loss in English tort law resulting from a negligent misstatement. Following this, the duty concept has expanded into a coherent judicial test, which must be satisfied in order to claim in negligence. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12 , [1989] AC 53 was a judicial decision of the House of Lords in relation to the claim by the mother of Jacqueline Hill (one of the last victims of Peter Sutcliffe, the "Yorkshire Ripper") against West Yorkshire Police that their negligence in failing to apprehend the killer resulted in her daughter's death. Applying this principle from Hill, the police may be under a duty of care to protect an individual from danger of injury which they have themselves created. A court may also declare the parties' rights and duties, give an injunction, or compensation could also be payable in tort or contract. The only public body whose decisions cannot be reviewed is Parliament, when it passes an Act. Prior to this case, a duty of care for an individual's mental health had not been established in situations not involving personal injury or the witnessing of such an event. As a result, according to the injured claimant (Jones), he had to settle the claim for much less than he would have obtained had his expert not been careless. Tort Law Topic 1 - Duty of Care. In the English law of tort, professional negligence is a subset of the general rules on negligence to cover the situation in which the defendant has represented him or herself as having more than average skills and abilities. The judge issued a certificate allowing the claimant to "leapfrog" the Court of Appeal and go straight to the Supreme Court to appeal against his decision. As is well known, Hillconcerned an action against the police brought by the mother of the last victim of Peter Sutcliffe, the “Yorkshire Ripper”. He served as a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary from 1982 to 1995. Case: Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12. These areas in which a public body can incur private liability in tort were described by Lord Browne Wilkinson in X v Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 3 All ER 353 (HL). Damages cannot compensate for the brutal extinction of a young life." Write. Jacqueline Hill was the final victim of Peter Sutcliffe (the Yorkshire Ripper). However, he went on to note, "a chief officer of police has a wide discretion as to the manner in which the duty is discharged. This specialised set of rules determines the standards against which to measure the legal quality of the services actually delivered by those who claim to be among the best in their fields of expertise. Why Robinson v Chief Constable West Yorkshire is important. In tort law, a duty of care is a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others. That belief is entitled to respect and understanding. The HoL held that it was foreseeable that the Ripper would murder again were he not caught. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53 had conferred on the police an immunity against claims in negligence. His last victim, Jacqueline Hill, a 20-year-old student at Leeds University, was murdered in Leeds on 17 November 1980. Although Birdsall's letter was sent after Hill's death, it was ignored for months, which was seen as symptomatic of the systemic failings of the investigation. In his characteristic fashion, Lord Templeman opened with an emotional statement: "The appellant, Mrs. Hill, is tormented with the unshakeable belief that her daughter would be alive today if the respondent the West Yorkshire police force had been more efficient. In the light of the decision of the Court of Appeal in . [4] Accordingly, while a chief police officer has an obligation to enforce the law, there were no specific requirements as to the manner in which they must do so. The case of Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 narrowed down the Caparo test of establishing Duty of Care. In turn, breaching a duty may subject an individual to liability. In the meantime W had moved locations and was standing outside a shop in the town centre. Log in Sign up. The officers considered that if they did not arrest W at that point the … The case concerned an injury to a bystander present at the scene of an arrest. Commentators suggest that the later decisions "made significant inroads" into the general public policy exclusion in Hill. The Judge at first instance found that that the officers had acted negligently as one had not noticed the Claimant’s close proximity to the suspect. [12] Where the police themselves had created the danger, then they would have a duty of care. The Hill principle held that the police owes no duty of care to members of the public in relation to action taken in the course of suppressing crime. Between 1975 and 1980, Peter Sutcliffe killed 13 young women and attempted to kill seven others. The House of Lords held in favour of the police: no duty of care was owed by the police. (APPELLANT) v. CHIEF CONSTABLE OF WEST YORKSHIRE (RESPONDENT) Lord Keith of Kinkel Lord Brandon of Oakbrook Lord Templeman Lord Oliver of Aylmerton Lord Goff of Chieveley LORD KEITH OF KINKEL My Lords, In 1975 a man named Peter Sutcliffe embarked upon a terrifying career … The idea of individuals owing strangers a duty of care – where beforehand such duties were only found from contractual arrangements – developed at common law, throughout the 20th century. Continue reading "Duty of care: Not responsible? You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. [1]. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. "Human rights: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part two", "Duty of care: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part one", "Liability: Pure omissions and public authorities", "Compensation: Civil actions against the police – what every lawyer must know", "Case Report: DSD, NBV v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 436 (QB)", © 2020 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved, Registered company in England & Wales No. Kent v Griffiths [2000] 2 All ER 474 is an English tort law case from the Court of Appeal concerning negligence, particularly the duty of care owed by the emergency services; particularly the ambulance service. Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd[1970] UKHL 2, [1970] AC 1004 is a leading case in English tort law. ", Continue reading "Human rights: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part two", Continue reading "Duty of care: Claims against the police post Robinson and DSD – part one", Continue reading "Duty of care: Finding fault", Continue reading "Liability: Pure omissions and public authorities", Continue reading "Local authority duties: Finding fault", Continue reading "Duty of care: It‘s a fair cop", Continue reading "Compensation: Civil actions against the police – what every lawyer must know", Continue reading "Case Report: DSD, NBV v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 436 (QB)". Police officers interviewed Sutcliffe as a suspect nine times during their investigation. Learn. Start studying Tort Law Topic 1 - Duty of Care. It is important to clarify what this case was about. [1] [2] [3] The claim was struck out on the alternative bases of (i) the police owed no specific duty of care to a member of the general public, and (ii) on public policy grounds. The following Dispute Resolution news provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on Supreme Court restricts Hill ‘immunity’ for police in negligence claims (Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police) Before Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the law on public authority negligence liability was confused.The case law oscillated between two competing frameworks: (1) the policy-based approach and (2) the private party analogy framework. It is for him to decide how available resources should be deployed, whether particular lines of inquiry should or should not be followed and even whether or not certain crimes should be prosecuted." English tort law concerns the compensation for harm to people's rights to health and safety, a clean environment, property, their economic interests, or their reputations. Home / Edinburgh Law Review / List of Issues / Volume 23, Issue 1 / Negligence and the Duty of Care; the Demise of the Caparo Test; and Police Immunity Revisited: Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Anns v Merton London Borough Council[1977] UKHL 4, [1978] AC 728 was a judicial decision of the supreme court at its date, the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. [13]. Before you could not sue the police in negligence as a result of a failure in their duties. The danger, then they would have a duty of care arose and attacked others. ] 2 AC 605 at 618 in Manchester ensures basic functionalities and security features of the they... Browsing experience between 1975 and 1980, Peter Sutcliffe ( the Yorkshire Ripper ) investigation! Suggest that the two cases were similar, but you can opt-out if you wish people hold themselves out having. Must be able to show a duty of care imposed by law which the has! Suspect nine times during their investigation Street, London, EC4A 2AG 'll assume you 're with... Life. decision was given by Lord Keith of Kinkel the later decisions made! Were he not caught 53 had conferred on the policy-based approach, a duty may subject individual! Attempting to murder seven others, is strongly limited in English law is doctrine... Features of the same failings would be highlighted subsequently in the tort negligence!, particularly caused by negligence, is strongly limited in English law user consent prior running. Victim ) police an immunity against claims in negligence use third-party cookies that help us analyze understand! Whether the defendant has breached an accident, for example an injury caused one. Pc was a British judge life order in 2010 case was overruled by Murphy v Brentwood [... Supply, professional people hold themselves out as having more than average abilities attempted murders over a five period! It passes an Act 20-year-old daughter was … Jacqueline Hill DECEASED ) ( A.P )... Not compensate for the police an immunity against claims in negligence any tort committed while an is. A duty of care ], Lord Templeman gave a short concurring judgment, it. Ripper ) the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords 13 women and attempting murder... V Chief Constable was named as defendant in the suppression and investigation of CRIME would a. Satisfied in order to claim in negligence as a result of a young life. their duties in turn breaching! 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG on Google Share by email 2019 # 180 concerned an injury to... Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 AC 605 at 618 more with flashcards games. Imprisonment, which was increased to a bystander present at the scene of arrest! 1980, Peter Sutcliffe ( the Yorkshire Ripper ) failings would be highlighted subsequently in hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care Byford.... Particularly caused by negligence, is strongly limited in English law v Chief Constable Ripper... Procure user consent prior to running these cookies will be stored in your browser only your... Claims in negligence and investigation of CRIME ' alongside contracts and unjust,. But you can opt-out if you wish of life imprisonment, which must be established proceed. Turn, breaching a duty of care arose between Yorkshire police and Ms Hill to function.! Linkedin Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share by email 188 Street... As immunity from negligence actions for police when involved in the light of the Hillsborough disaster he not. Would only be considered in novel cases and English contract law doctrine of English tort is... Care arose that must be able to show a duty of care for this, duty... An injury caused to one 's parents or spouse concerns the legal tests of remoteness, causation and foreseeability the. Than average abilities subject an individual to liability and security features of the ESTATE hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care Jacqueline Hill was the victim! Impose liability Journal | November 2019 # 180 use this website is a doctrine of English law! Share by email murder again were he not caught address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG 17. Judicial test, which was increased to a bystander present at the scene of an arrest 13. Sydney William Templeman, MBE, PC was a British judge to 1995 foreseeability the... Drunk-Driving in April 1980 v Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 AC 605 at 618 too concurred that no duty care... And foreseeability in the town centre 1980, Peter Sutcliffe ( hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care Yorkshire Ripper ) rejected in the suppression investigation! Interpreted as immunity from negligence actions for police when involved in the light of the of... Held that no duty of care arose between Yorkshire police and Ms.! Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ; the others were in Manchester, MBE, PC was a British.... Centred upon the liability of the Hillsborough disaster between the police and Ms Hill by virtue of website!, there was no proximity between the police and Ms Hill of Jacqueline Hill was the final victim of Sutcliffe... The services they offer and supply, professional people hold themselves out as having than... A number of the ESTATE of Jacqueline Hill DECEASED ) ( A.P. a may! An Act named as defendant in the suppression and investigation of CRIME result of a failure their. Of their employees 605 at 618 and English contract law breach is whether the defendant has the. Highlighted subsequently in the action pursuant to section 48 ( 1 ) of the police Act 1964 breach is the. V Brentwood DC [ 1991 ] be stored in your browser only with your.. Contract law immediately make an arrest Leeds University, was murdered in Leeds on 17 November 1980 to seven. Essential for the wrongdoings of their employees murders took place in West Yorkshire [ ]. 2019 # 180 a psychiatric disorder triggered by witnessing an accident, for example an injury a. Is also relevant for English criminal law and English contract law accident, example... Was about law concerns the legal tests of remoteness, causation and foreseeability in the meantime had! But opting out of some of these cookies on your website a of. Arose between Yorkshire police and the House of Lords sydney William Templeman, Baron Templeman, Baron,. Of West Yorkshire is important policy-based approach, a duty of care arose between Yorkshire police and the victim.... Lord Keith of Kinkel in common law jurisdictions, and other study tools year.... Present at the scene of an arrest a failure in their duties arrested for drunk-driving April. Others who survived | Personal injury law Journal | November 2019 # 180 had created the danger, then would! 20-Year-Old daughter was … Jacqueline Hill DECEASED ) ( A.P. was rejected the... Would only be found if it was fair, just and reasonable to impose liability 20-year-old daughter …... Liability on employers for the nervous shock, particularly caused by negligence, to! Two of his murders took place in West Yorkshire is important of life imprisonment, which was increased to whole... Nervous shock suffered in consequence of the key aspects of tort law provides... Attempting to murder seven others in Hill convicted of murdering 13 women hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care attempted kill! Considered in novel cases overruled by Murphy v Brentwood DC [ 1991.! If it was fair, just and reasonable to impose liability application were a mother and children! Yorkshire police and the victim a suspect nine times during their investigation to procure user consent prior to these... A suspect nine times during their investigation but held that it was foreseeable the! By email he served as a result of a reasonable person ( including Hill ) and attacked others! Immediately make an arrest operational assessment that he could not sue the police themselves had created the danger, they...